EN
Down Arrow
User Icon
Hamburger Icon
ACCUEIL
Actualités
`
À propos du GAC
Avis du GAC
Réunions et enregistrements
Dossiers de travail
Get Involved
À propos du GAC
Rôle du GAC
Principes opérationnels
Équipe de direction
Membres du GAC
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
Avis du GAC
Communiqués
Correspondance
Avis détaillé
Principes et directives
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
Réunions et enregistrements
Calendrier
Calendrier des réunions de l’ICANN
Procès-verbaux des réunions de l’ICANN
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
Dossiers de travail
Thèmes 
Activités
Groupes de travail du GAC
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
X
العربية
中文
English
Français
Pусский
Español
SEARCH
X

RECHERCHER SUR LE SITE WEB DU GAC

Rechercher

Avis du GAC

Le GAC émet des avis adressés au Conseil d’administration de l’ICANN sur des dossiers de politiques susceptibles d’impliquer une interaction entre les politiques de l’ICANN et des lois, des accords internationaux ou des objectifs en matière de politiques publiques. L’avis du GAC est communiqué au Conseil d’administration de l’ICANN sous forme de Communiqué ou de correspondance officielle.

2012-06-28-IDN-2

Avis du GAC

Référence n° :

2012-06-28-IDN-2

First Delivered via :

N/A

Consensus :

Consensus atteint

2012-06-28-IDN-2

Communication

In principle the GAC considers that the introduction of IDN ccTLDs on an expeditious basis is in the global public interest. The GAC notes that a conservative approach has been taken in respect of two character IDN applications. The GAC is of the view that decisions may have erred on the too-conservative side, in effect applying a more stringent test of confusability between Latin and non-Latin scripts than when undertaking a side by side comparison of Latin strings. A practical approach should be followed allowing confusability to be pragmatically considered on a case by case basis, following publicly documented criteria.

The GAC advises the Board:

  • the GAC will write to the Board with further reflections on the methodology that should be followed when evaluating two character IDNs.

Communication

In principle the GAC considers that the introduction of IDN ccTLDs on an expeditious basis is in the global public interest. The GAC notes that a conservative approach has been taken in respect of two character IDN applications. The GAC is of the view that decisions may have erred on the too-conservative side, in effect applying a more stringent test of confusability between Latin and non-Latin scripts than when undertaking a side by side comparison of Latin strings. A practical approach should be followed allowing confusability to be pragmatically considered on a case by case basis, following publicly documented criteria.

The GAC advises the Board:

  • the GAC will write to the Board with further reflections on the methodology that should be followed when evaluating two character IDNs.

GAC Acknowledgement of Register Entry

27 July 2012

Next Steps/Required Action

Draft letter to Elise Gerich circulated to GAC mailing list, edits and comments requested by 7 September 2012 with intention of finalizing letter after that date.

Responsible Party

GAC

Current Status/Communications Log

GAC Response to Elise Gerich.pdf