EN
Down Arrow
User Icon
Hamburger Icon
SEARCH
X

بحث موقع GAC

بحث

مشورة GAC

تقدم اللجنة الاستشارية الحكومية GAC المشورة الى مجلس إدارة ICANN حول قضايا السياسات التي قد تتداخل مع سياسات ICANN ومختلف القوانين والاتفاقيات الدولية وأهداف المصلحة العامة. ويتم تقديم مشورة اللجنة الاستشارية الحكومية GAC الى مجلس إدارة ICANN من خلال إما البيان الاختتامي للجنة او عبر المراسلات الرسمية.

2014-10-16-Transition of US Stewardship of IANA and Strengthening ICANN Accountability

مشورة GAC

الرقم المرجعي:

2014-10-16-Transition of US Stewardship of IANA and Strengthening ICANN Accountability

First Delivered 15 Oct 2014 via :

ICANN51 Los Angeles Communique

الإجماع:

تحقق الإجماع

2014-10-16-Transition of US Stewardship of IANA and Strengthening ICANN Accountability

Communication

1. Transition of US Stewardship of IANA and Strengthening ICANN Accountability

The GAC met with members of the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) and was briefed on the transition proposal process in relation to names, numbers and protocol parameters.

a. The GAC advises the ICANN Board that:

i. The GAC and its Members will be working actively through the Cross Community Working Groups
established on:

                      1. Development of an IANA stewardship transition proposal on naming related functions; and
                      2. ICANN accountability and governance. GAC notes that key operational details for the ICANN accountability and governance work stream are still being developed in the community.

ii. The IANA transition process should be guided by consensus based decisions and serve the public interest with clearly implementable, transparent and verifiable accountability mechanisms that satisfy requirements of all affected stakeholders.

iii. The concept of public interest should be seen as encompassing the larger interest of the different communities affected by Internet Governance processes and not be limited to the interests and objectives of any group or set of stakeholders.

iv. It is crucial to make sure accountability processes are guided by the necessary public policy considerations in addition to a technical perspective. It is crucial to make sure these processes are structured in a way that all stakeholders are involved – including governments – in order to ensure that the final outcome of the exercise is also considered legitimate by all participants.

Responsible Party

ICANN Board

Current Status/Communications Log