EN
Down Arrow
User Icon
Hamburger Icon
ACCUEIL
Actualités
`
À propos du GAC
Avis du GAC
Réunions et enregistrements
Dossiers de travail
Get Involved
À propos du GAC
Rôle du GAC
Principes opérationnels
Équipe de direction
Membres du GAC
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
Avis du GAC
Communiqués
Correspondance
Avis détaillé
Principes et directives
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
Réunions et enregistrements
Calendrier
Calendrier des réunions de l’ICANN
Procès-verbaux des réunions de l’ICANN
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
Dossiers de travail
Thèmes 
Activités
Groupes de travail du GAC
EN SAVOIR PLUS
EN SAVOIR PLUS
X
العربية
中文
English
Français
Pусский
Español
SEARCH
X

RECHERCHER SUR LE SITE WEB DU GAC

Rechercher

Avis du GAC

Le GAC émet des avis adressés au Conseil d’administration de l’ICANN sur des dossiers de politiques susceptibles d’impliquer une interaction entre les politiques de l’ICANN et des lois, des accords internationaux ou des objectifs en matière de politiques publiques. L’avis du GAC est communiqué au Conseil d’administration de l’ICANN sous forme de Communiqué ou de correspondance officielle.

2011-06-23-LEA-1

Avis du GAC

Référence n° :

2011-06-23-LEA-1

First Delivered via :

N/A

Consensus :

Consensus atteint

2011-06-23-LEA-1

Communication

The GAC, together with representatives of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) from several GAC members, engaged with the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Registrar Stakeholder Group on the status of LEA efforts to advance a “code of conduct” or “agreed best practices”, and reinforced the critical importance of demonstrating concrete and effective support for LEA objectives to include a timetable of implementable actions. The GAC welcomes the registrars’ offer to identify any substantive implementation issues with any unresolved LEA recommendations, for further dialogue with the GAC.

The GAC recalls its endorsement of LEA recommendations for due diligence and amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement in June 2010, and urges the Board to support actions necessary to implement those recommendations as a matter of urgency.

Next Steps/Required Action

  1. Registrars to identify issues or GAC for further dialogue
  2. Board Support of actions to implement RAA amendments

Responsible Party

  1. Registrars
  2. Board

Communication

The GAC, together with representatives of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) from several GAC members, engaged with the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Registrar Stakeholder Group on the status of LEA efforts to advance a “code of conduct” or “agreed best practices”, and reinforced the critical importance of demonstrating concrete and effective support for LEA objectives to include a timetable of implementable actions. The GAC welcomes the registrars’ offer to identify any substantive implementation issues with any unresolved LEA recommendations, for further dialogue with the GAC.

The GAC recalls its endorsement of LEA recommendations for due diligence and amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement in June 2010, and urges the Board to support actions necessary to implement those recommendations as a matter of urgency.

Next Steps/Required Action

  1. Registrars to identify issues or GAC for further dialogue
  2. Board Support of actions to implement RAA amendments

Responsible Party

  1. Registrars
  2. Board