EN
Down Arrow
User Icon
Hamburger Icon
SEARCH
X

BÚSQUEDA en SITIO WEB del GAC

Buscar

Asesoramiento del GAC

El GAC asesora a la Junta Directiva de la ICANN sobre temas de política toda vez que pudiera haber una interacción entre las políticas de la ICANN, distintas leyes, acuerdos internacionales y objetivos en materia de política pública. El asesoramiento del GAC es transmitido a la Junta Directiva de la ICANN mediante un comunicado o una carta formal.

2011-06-23-LEA-1

Asesoramiento del GAC

N.° de referencia:

2011-06-23-LEA-1

First Delivered via :

N/A

Consenso:

Consenso alcanzado

2011-06-23-LEA-1

Communication

The GAC, together with representatives of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) from several GAC members, engaged with the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Registrar Stakeholder Group on the status of LEA efforts to advance a “code of conduct” or “agreed best practices”, and reinforced the critical importance of demonstrating concrete and effective support for LEA objectives to include a timetable of implementable actions. The GAC welcomes the registrars’ offer to identify any substantive implementation issues with any unresolved LEA recommendations, for further dialogue with the GAC.

The GAC recalls its endorsement of LEA recommendations for due diligence and amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement in June 2010, and urges the Board to support actions necessary to implement those recommendations as a matter of urgency.

Next Steps/Required Action

  1. Registrars to identify issues or GAC for further dialogue
  2. Board Support of actions to implement RAA amendments

Responsible Party

  1. Registrars
  2. Board

Communication

The GAC, together with representatives of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) from several GAC members, engaged with the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Registrar Stakeholder Group on the status of LEA efforts to advance a “code of conduct” or “agreed best practices”, and reinforced the critical importance of demonstrating concrete and effective support for LEA objectives to include a timetable of implementable actions. The GAC welcomes the registrars’ offer to identify any substantive implementation issues with any unresolved LEA recommendations, for further dialogue with the GAC.

The GAC recalls its endorsement of LEA recommendations for due diligence and amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement in June 2010, and urges the Board to support actions necessary to implement those recommendations as a matter of urgency.

Next Steps/Required Action

  1. Registrars to identify issues or GAC for further dialogue
  2. Board Support of actions to implement RAA amendments

Responsible Party

  1. Registrars
  2. Board