Iran, Argentina, Denmark, Canada, Brazil
GAC Members of the CCWG Accountability Work Stream 2 to report on programs and next steps for the Working Group as it relates to the GAC. (heading 5)
1. GAC to be kept informed of developments and consider responses to WS2 draft proposals and requests for information on their merits (GAC Members of CCWG-WS2 + ACIG GAC Secretariat).
The GAC-nominated members of the CCWG-Accountability WS2 reported on developments at the plenary and sub-group levels. It was agreed that all GAC Members should make particular efforts to be involved in the work of the relevant sub-groups as the process moves towards a draft report.
Discussion of the topics most relevant to the GAC covered:
- Jurisdiction: This is a priority for some GAC members. It is up to individual GAC members to respond to the current questionnaire from the relevant sub-group.
- SO/AC Accountability: A common GAC view on the draft recommendations is desirable.
- Human Rights: A common GAC view on the draft recommendations is desirable.
- Diversity: A consolidated GAC response to the forthcoming questionnaire from the sub-group is desirable.
- Transparency: Noted but not discussed in detail.
The GAC agreed to advise ICANN and the CCWG Co-Chairs that limiting the scope of ATRT3 to avoid overlap with WS2 work is a matter for the review team to consider when it is formed.
Implementation by the GAC of relevant Bylaws arising from CCWG WS1 recommendations is covered under “Internal GAC Matters” below.
| Title |
|---|