EN
Down Arrow
User Icon
Hamburger Icon
`
SEARCH
X

GAC 网站搜索

搜索

GAC 建议

政府咨询委员会 (GAC) 针对政策事务向 ICANN 董事会提交建议。这些政策事务涉及 ICANN 政策与各种法律、国际协定和公共政策目标之间的互动。GAC 建议通过一份《公报》或正式信函与 ICANN 董事会进行沟通。

2014-10-16-Reviews of First Round of New gTLDs and Preparation for Subsequent Rounds

GAC 建议

参考号:

2014-10-16-Reviews of First Round of New gTLDs and Preparation for Subsequent Rounds

First Delivered 15 Oct 2014 via :

ICANN51 Los Angeles Communique

共识:

共识已达成

2014-10-16-Reviews of First Round of New gTLDs and Preparation for Subsequent Rounds

Communication

3. Reviews of First Round of New gTLDs and Preparation for Subsequent Rounds

The GAC was briefed by ICANN staff on the recently released New gTLD Program Reviews and Assessments Draft Work Plan, and discussed the issues with the ICANN Board:

a. The GAC advises the ICANN Board that:

i. The review processes should be conducted and finalised before policy for the further gTLD rounds is developed and should include community-wide engagement on the issues of communication to and access by developing countries and regions, and all aspects of the framework for community-based gTLDs.

ii. Appropriate and realistic timeframes should be applied to the review processes to ensure that all lessons of the most recent round are captured, and to avoid further stressing the capacity of both ICANN and the community to do the necessary work.

Responsible Party

ICANN Board

Communication

3. Reviews of First Round of New gTLDs and Preparation for Subsequent Rounds

The GAC was briefed by ICANN staff on the recently released New gTLD Program Reviews and Assessments Draft Work Plan, and discussed the issues with the ICANN Board:

a. The GAC advises the ICANN Board that:

i. The review processes should be conducted and finalised before policy for the further gTLD rounds is developed and should include community-wide engagement on the issues of communication to and access by developing countries and regions, and all aspects of the framework for community-based gTLDs.

ii. Appropriate and realistic timeframes should be applied to the review processes to ensure that all lessons of the most recent round are captured, and to avoid further stressing the capacity of both ICANN and the community to do the necessary work.

Responsible Party

ICANN Board