Early Engagement Policy Document - Thick Whois

Policy Development Process (PDP) Update

‘Thick’ WHOIS Policy Development Process

April 2017

UPCOMING DATES

Following the publications of the Thick Whois Consensus Policies in February 2017 for the Consistent Labeling and Display of RDDS (Whois) Output for All gTLDs and the Thick RDDS (Whois) Transition for .COM, .NET and .JOBS, the implementations work began. On 1 May 2017, the registries plan to open the Operational Test Environment for registrars to test the thick data transfer to registries.  On 1 August 2017,  all gTLDs will require Consisten Labeling and Display of RDDS Outputs.

SUMMARY

ICANN specifies WHOIS service requirements through its agreements with gTLD Registries and Registrars. Registries have historically satisfied their WHOIS obligations under two different models, characterized as “thin” and “thick” WHOIS registries. In a thin registration model the Registry only collects and publishes the minimal information associated with the domain name from the Registrar (such as DNS technical information).  All of the registrant’s contact information is maintained by the Registrar, which publishes it via their own WHOIS services. In a thick registration model the Registry collects both sets of data (domain name and registrant) from the Registrar and in turn publishes that data via WHOIS.  The Council initiated a Policy Development Process (PDP) to consider a possible requirement of "thick" WHOIS for all gTLDs. This issue is one that also affects access to WHOIS data, which is a law-enforcement-related issue.  The GAC has indicated its interest in both WHOIS and law enforcement-related issues in previous GAC Communiqués. The Thick WHOIS WG finalized its report and submitted it to the GNSO Council on 21 October 2013. The GNSO Council unanimously adopted the recommendation to require Thick WHOIS for all gTLD registries at its meeting on 31 October 2013. Following the public comment forum and the notification of the GAC, the ICANN Board considered the recommendations and adopted these at its meeting on 7 February 2014.

ICANN Staff and the Thick Whois IRT have identified two outcomes for the Thick Whois Policy recommendations and agreed that their implementation could be decoupled:

• Consistent Labeling and Display of Whois output for all gTLDs
• Transition from thin to thick for .COM, .NET and .JOBS

Both policies have been published with implementation notes on 1 February 2017 consisting of  three effective dates:

• Consistent Labeling and Display of Whois output for all gTLDs by 1 August 2017
• Transition from thin to thick for .COM, .NET and .JOBS (for new registrations) by 1 May 2018
• Transition from thin to thick for .COM, .NET and .JOBS (for exisitng registrations) by 1 February 2019

GAC ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITY STATUS 

Following the publication of the policies, the Implementation Review Team is working with the ICANN Organization on the implementation of the policies.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

• Thick Whois Transtioin Policy for .COM, .NET and .JOBS:  https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/thick-whois-transition-policy-2017-02-01-en
• Registry Registration Data Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy:  https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdds-labeling-policy-2017-02-01-en
• PDP Documentation: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/thick-whois.htm
• PDP WG Final Report: http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-final-21oct13-en.pdf 
• Thick Whois Implementation: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/thick-whois-2016-06-27-en
• Thick Whois IRT Workspace: https://community.icann.org/display/TWCPI
• Public Comment period on Consistent Labeling and Display implementation proposal: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdds-output-2015-12-03-en
• Public Comment period on Transition from thin to thick for .COM, .NET and .JOBS https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-implementation-gnso-thick-rdds-whois-transition-2016-10-26-en

Related Pages

• Early GAC engagement in GNSO and ccNSO PDPs
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - IGO INGO Curative Rights
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - Translation and Transliteration
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - IRTP D
  • Early Engagement Policy document - Thick Whois
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - IGO INGO
  • Early Engagement Policy Documents - LOCK UDRP
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - IRTP C
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - Framework Of Interpretation
  • Early Engagement Policy Document - ccNSO - Study Group on Country Names as TLDs
  • Archives - Early GAC engagement in GNSO and ccNSO PDPs
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - April 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - December 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - February 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - January 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - June 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - May 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - October 2013
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - September 2013
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - 2012
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - December 2012
      • Early Engagement Policy Documents - November 2012
    • GAC Early Engagement Policy Documents
    • GAC Early Engagement Policy Documents - Mid August Update 2013
    • Early GAC engagement in GNSO and ccNSO PDPs - January 2015
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - 2014
    • Early Engagement in GNSO and ccNSO PDPs - March 2015
    • Early GAC Engagement in GNSO and ccNSO PDPs - April 2015
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - July 2015
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - August 2015
    • Engagement Policy Documents - September 2015
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - May 2015
    • Engagement Policy Documents - November 2015
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - December 2015
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - January 2016
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - March 2016
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - April 2016
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - June 2016
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - July 2016
    • Early Engagement Policy Documents - September 2016
  • Early Engagement Policy Documents - PDP gTLD Registration Data
  • Early Engagement Policy Documents - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
  • Early Engagement Policy Documents - Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs (PDP)