2013-04-11-WHOIS
GAC Advice
2013-04-11-WHOIS
N/A
Consensus met
2013-04-11-WHOIS
Communication
1. WHOIS
The GAC urges the ICANN Board to:
a. ensure that the GAC Principles Regarding gTLD WHOIS Services, approved in 2007, are duly taken into account by the recently established Directory Services Expert Working Group.
The GAC stands ready to respond to any questions with regard to the GAC Principles.
The GAC also expects its views to be incorporated into whatever subsequent policy development process might be initiated once the Expert Working Group concludes its efforts.
GAC Acknowledgement of Register Entry
GAC: 2 May 2013
Board: 9 May 2013
Next Steps/Required Action
Board Action:
Item | Resp. | Start | Compl. | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Publish GAC Communique and notify applicants of 21-day GAC Advice Response Period | Staff | 18 April | Complete | |
Applicants 21-day response period to GAC Advice | Applicants | 19 April | 10 May | Complete |
Publish GAC Communique to solicit input on how the New gTLD Board Committee should address GAC advice regarding safeguards applicable to broad categories of New gTLD Strings | Staff | 23 April | Complete | |
Public Comment period on how Board should address GAC Advice re: Safeguards http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gac-safeguard-advice-23apr13-en.htm |
Public | 23 April |
Comment: 14 May Reply: 4 June |
Complete |
Collect and summarize applicant responses to GAC Advice | Staff | 11 May | 31 May | Complete |
Summarize and analyze public comments on how Board should address GAC Advice re: Safeguards | Staff | 5 June | 12 June | Complete |
Review and Consider Applicant responses to GAC Advice and Public Comments on how Board should respond to GAC Advice re: Safeguards | New gTLD Program Committee | 13 June | 20 June | Not Started
The NGPC is also developing a GAC Scorecard similar to the one used during the GAC and the Board meetings in Brussels on 28 February and 1 March 2011. Each scorecard item will be noted with a '1A' '1B' or '2' 1A: Indicates that the NGPC's proposed position is consistent with GAC Advice as described in the Scorecard. 1B: Indicates that the NGPC's proposed position is consistent with GAC Advice as described in the Scorecard in principle, with some revisions to be made. 2: Indicates that the NGPC's current position is not consistent with GAC advice as described in the Scorecard and further discussion with the GAC is required following the relevant procedures in the ICANN Bylaws. Updates: http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-14jun13-en.htm Board Scorecard: |
Summary of GAC Advice | NGPC Response | |||
The GAC urges the ICANN Board to:
ensure that the GAC Principles Regarding gTLD WHOIS Services, approved in 2007, are duly taken into account by the recently established Directory Services Expert Working Group. |
1A | The NGPC Accepts this advice. The NGPC notes that the staff has confirmed that the GAC Principles have been shared with the Expert Working Group. |
Current Status/Communications Log
10 May 2013 - Letter from the ICANN Board re: Progress in Addressing GAC Beijing Advice
6 June 2013: NGPC Scorecard
Board Action (Accept/Disagree)
Accept
NGPC Consideration of GAC Beijing Advice 07-03-13[2].docx
- The GAC Principles have been shared with the Expert Working Group.
- See http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-04jun13-en.htm and http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/new-gtld-resolution-annex-1-04jun13-en.pdf